Motion 096

English title

Setting area-based targets on scientific evidence and reversing historic injustices

Titre en français

Setting area-based targets on scientific evidence and reversing historic injustices

Título en español

Setting area-based targets on scientific evidence and reversing historic injustices

Status
Published
Submission language
English
Working language
English

 

Fichiers en français
    No files yet
Archivos en español
    No files yet
Proponent (Sponsor)
The WILD Foundation ( United States of America )
Co-sponsors
Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society ( Canada )
Wilderness Foundation ( South Africa )
Kua`aina Ulu `Auamo ( United States of America )
Natural Resources Defense Council ( United States of America )
Center for Large Landscape Conservation ( United States of America )
Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental ( Peru )
Rainforest Trust ( United States of America )
Explanatory memorandum
Recognition that the quantity of intact ecosystems present on a landscape is as vital as the quality stretches back to at least the early 1970 with research that concluded when approximately half of wetlands are degraded, ecological functionality precipitously declines. Over the decades, the hypothesis was tested across numerous landscape types, eventually culminating in Reed Noss’ conclusion (1994) that a healthy biosphere requires at least half of nature to remain intact. In the early 2000s numerous NGOs began to adopt this spatial target as the necessary goal for global conservation, including the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS) and the WILD Foundation. In 2009, the 9th World Wilderness Congress convened in Merída, Mexico and resulted in a global call for the protection of half of Earth’s lands and seas. Over a decade later, E.O. Wilson popularized this area-based target with the publication of his book Half Earth.

In more recent years, a global survey of conservation scientists (Woodley 2019) found that nearly 70% believed we must protect at least half of Earth’s lands and seas, making this target the scientific consensus.

We believe that it is the IUCN’s responsibility, especially as the world begins to prepare the agenda that will shape 2030 Global Biodiversity Framework, to educate leaders around the world on what the actual scientific area-based target is, providing them with pathways to achieve the half target that also strengthen and support Indigenous land tenure for conservation outcomes.

REFERENCES:

Odum, H.T. and Odum, E. (1972.) Natural areas as necessary components of man’s total environment. Reprinted from the Thirty Seventh North American Wildlife Conference. Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C. January 10: https://www.emergysociety.com/wp-content/uploads/OdumEP-and-HT-Odum.1972.Natural-Areas-as-Necessary-Components-Mans-Total-Emnviro.pdf

Noss, Reed F., and Allen Y. Cooperrider. (1994.) Saving Nature’s Legacy: Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Woodley, S. et al. (2019.) Area-based conservation beyond 2020: A global survey of conservation scientists. Parks Vol. 25. 2 November 2019: https://naturebeyond2020.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Woodley-et-al-survey-PARKS-25.2-Proof-5.pdf
Geographic scope
Global
Nature and biodiversity
Forests
Marine & Coastal
Wetlands
Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF)
Target 2: Restore 30% of all degraded ecosystems
Target 3: Conserve 30% of land, waters and seas
Target 19: Mobilize $200 billion per year for biodiversity from all sources, including $30 billion through international finance
Sustainable Development Goals
Goal 16 - peace, justice and strong institutions