English title
Gestión y restauración de áreas afectadas por monocultivos de eucaliptos en regiones fuera de su distribución natural
Titre en français
Gestión y restauración de áreas afectadas por monocultivos de eucaliptos en regiones fuera de su distribución natural
Título en español
Gestión y restauración de áreas afectadas por monocultivos de eucaliptos en regiones fuera de su distribución natural
Status
Published
Submission language
Español
Working language
Español
English files
- No files yet
Fichiers en français
- No files yet
Archivos en español
- 013-V001-Areas afectadas por monocultivos de eucaliptos-ES.pdf 2025-03-31 16:04
- 013-V001-Areas afectadas por monocultivos de eucaliptos-ES.docx 2025-03-31 15:06
More information
Proponent (Sponsor)
SEO/BirdLife, Sociedad Española de Ornitología ( Spain )
Co-sponsors
Sociedad Audubon de Panama ( Panama )
Sociedad Geológica de España ( Spain )
Sociedad Española para la Defensa del Patrimonio Geológico y Minero ( Spain )
Asociación para la Defensa de la Naturaleza y los Recursos de Extremadura ( Spain )
Asociación Herpetológica Española ( Spain )
Red Cambera ( Spain )
Asociación Guyra Paraguay Conservación de Aves ( Paraguay )
Explanatory memorandum
The proposed motion focuses on addressing the environmental and socio-economic impacts of Eucalyptus monocultures established outside their natural range. These plantations, while economically important, often lead to significant biodiversity loss, soil degradation, water depletion, and increased wildfire risks. Despite existing IUCN efforts to combat invasive species and manage forestry plantations, a dedicated approach to this issue is necessary due to the unique combination of ecological and economic factors surrounding Eucalyptus.
This motion seeks to promote sustainable management practices and ecological restoration in affected areas, prioritizing the recovery of native forests and the adoption of diversified forest and agroforestry systems. It also calls for stronger regulations to limit the expansion of monocultures in sensitive ecosystems and for coordinated international research to better understand the long-term impacts of Eucalyptus plantations.
The implementation of this motion would require financial support for scientific research, policy development, and restoration projects. Key funding sources could include national conservation budgets, international biodiversity programs, and public-private partnerships. Human resources needed include forestry experts, ecologists, local stakeholders, and regulatory authorities to ensure effective implementation and monitoring.
A motion is necessary because existing frameworks often address invasive species management broadly but fail to provide tailored strategies for commercially valuable species that simultaneously act as invasives. In this case, alternative approaches, such as relying solely on voluntary guidelines or regional agreements, have proven insufficient to mitigate the growing environmental pressures linked to these plantations. A formal motion would elevate the issue to a global platform, encouraging more cohesive and effective action across regions.
By adopting this motion, the IUCN can spearhead a coordinated response, providing member states with clear guidelines and tools to balance economic interests with conservation priorities, reinforcing ecosystem resilience, and safeguarding biodiversity for future generations.
This motion seeks to promote sustainable management practices and ecological restoration in affected areas, prioritizing the recovery of native forests and the adoption of diversified forest and agroforestry systems. It also calls for stronger regulations to limit the expansion of monocultures in sensitive ecosystems and for coordinated international research to better understand the long-term impacts of Eucalyptus plantations.
The implementation of this motion would require financial support for scientific research, policy development, and restoration projects. Key funding sources could include national conservation budgets, international biodiversity programs, and public-private partnerships. Human resources needed include forestry experts, ecologists, local stakeholders, and regulatory authorities to ensure effective implementation and monitoring.
A motion is necessary because existing frameworks often address invasive species management broadly but fail to provide tailored strategies for commercially valuable species that simultaneously act as invasives. In this case, alternative approaches, such as relying solely on voluntary guidelines or regional agreements, have proven insufficient to mitigate the growing environmental pressures linked to these plantations. A formal motion would elevate the issue to a global platform, encouraging more cohesive and effective action across regions.
By adopting this motion, the IUCN can spearhead a coordinated response, providing member states with clear guidelines and tools to balance economic interests with conservation priorities, reinforcing ecosystem resilience, and safeguarding biodiversity for future generations.
Geographic scope
Global
Nature and biodiversity
Aves
Invertebrados
Plantas
Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF)
Meta 3: Conservar el 30 % de las zonas terrestres, de aguas continentales y marinas
Meta 6: Reducir en un 50 % la introducción de especies exóticas invasoras y minimizar sus impactos
Meta 14: Integrar la biodiversidad en la toma de decisiones en todos los niveles
Sustainable Development Goals
Objetivo 12 - Consumo y producción responsables
Objetivo 15 - Vida de ecosistemas terrestres
Threats and drivers
Agricultura
Especies invasoras