Motion 143

English title

Developing an IUCN Policy and Guidance on Artificial Intelligence and Conservation, and the Integrity of Digital Evidence

Titre en français

Élaboration d’une politique et d’orientations de l’UICN relatives à l’intelligence artificielle et à la conservation, ainsi qu’à l’intégrité des preuves numériques

Título en español

Elaboración de una política y orientaciones de la UICN sobre inteligencia artificial y conservación, y la integridad de las pruebas digitales

Status
Plenary
Submission language
Inglés
Working language
Inglés

 

Proponent (Sponsor)
Exploralis ( Tunisia )
Wildlife Trust of India ( India )
Co-patrocinadores
Natural Resources Defense Council ( USA )
International Association for the Conservation of Geological Heritage ( Sweden )
Fundación Global Nature ( Spain )
Edama for Nature Conservation ( State of Libya )
Club Marocain pour l'Environnement et le Développement ( Morocco )
Association Marocaine pour la Protection de l`Environnement et le Climat ( Morocco )
Association Tunisienne de Taxonomie ( Tunisia )
Association de Continuité de Générations ( Tunisia )
Association pour la Protection de l'Environnement et le Développement Durable de Bizerte ( Tunisia )
Green Compass ( Tunisia )
A ROCHA GHANA ( Ghana )
Aaranyak ( India )
Alpenzoo Innsbruck-Tirol ( Austria )
Botanical Survey of India ( India )
Conservation X Labs, Inc. ( USA )
IORA Ecological Trust ( India )
Indianapolis Zoological Society, Inc. ( USA )
International Rivers ( USA )
MBOU-MON-TOUR ( DR Congo )
Mandai Nature Fund Ltd ( Singapore )
New Mexico BioPark Society ( USA )
Reserva: The Youth Land Trust ( USA )
Synchronicity Earth ( UK )
The Corbett Foundation ( India )
The WILD Foundation ( USA )
Wetlands International ( Netherlands )
Wildlife Protection Society of India ( India )
Wildscreen ( UK )
Zoological Society of London ( UK )
Zoological Survey of India ( India )
Zoologischer Garten Köln ( Germany )
Memorando explicativo
Conservation work rests on a fundamental principle: Evidence.
Camera-trap photos, acoustic recordings, satellite imagery, and citizen-science observations all shape knowledge, inform public policy, and uphold the credibility of conservation decisions.

Yet within just a few months, the rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has disrupted this foundation. Images, sounds, and maps can now be created or altered by algorithms, often beyond the capacity of human detection. For an organization built on scientific rigour, transparency, and public trust, this evolution poses a direct threat to the integrity of knowledge and the legitimacy of conservation action.

The challenge, however, is not only technical. AI models consume vast amounts of energy and materials, increasing the environmental footprint of the digital sector and at times contradicting the very principles of sustainability we promote. They also raise ethical and social concerns: unequal access to data and technology, marginalization of local knowledge systems, private appropriation of shared information, and potential violations of Indigenous Peoples’ and local communities’ rights.

Faced with these rapid transformations, there is an urgent need for a common framework for the responsible use of AI in conservation, one that safeguards data reliability, knowledge sovereignty, and ethical coherence across the Union’s activities.

This need coincides with a turning point in global governance: on 26 August 2025, the United Nations General Assembly adopted resolution A/79/L.118, establishing an Independent International Scientific Panel on AI and a Global Dialogue on AI Governance. This milestone opens an unprecedented opportunity for conservation voices to influence the emerging global norms for artificial intelligence. If IUCN does not engage now, these standards risk being defined without due consideration for ecological and ethical imperatives.

The motion therefore proposes the creation of an IUCN Strategic, Ethical and Ecological Framework for AI, to be developed through an interdisciplinary process involving the Commissions, Members, and field partners. This framework will aim to:

-Ensure the traceability and authenticity of visual and acoustic evidence;
-Strengthen the transparency and accountability of AI tools used by the Union;
-Promote media and information literacy (MIL) adapted to conservation professions;
- and assess and mitigate the environmental footprint of digital and AI-based solutions.

Implementation would draw on existing resources and programmes related to data governance, scientific communication, and capacity development. Early priorities include:

- A mapping of current AI uses across IUCN entities;
- The creation of a “Conservation & AI” learning module in cooperation with the CEC;
- and active engagement of IUCN in the Global Dialogue on AI Governance.

This motion is not a technocratic response, but an act of collective vigilance and responsibility toward a transformation that touches the very heart of conservation practice.
By acting now, IUCN reaffirms its role as an ethical and scientific compass , ensuring that artificial intelligence remains, at the service of life, not at the expense of its truth.

Geographic scope
Global
Naturaleza y biodiversidad
Aves
Mamíferos
Reptiles
Marco Mundial de Biodiversidad de Kunming-Montreal
Meta 14: Integrar la biodiversidad en la toma de decisiones en todos los niveles
Meta 20: Fortalecer la creación de capacidad, la transferencia de tecnología y la cooperación científica y técnica para la biodiversidad
Meta 21: Garantizar la disponibilidad y accesibilidad de conocimientos para orientar las acciones en materia de biodiversidad
Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible
Objetivo 9 - Industria, innovación e infraestructura
Objetivo 16 - Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
Objetivo 17 - Alianzas para lograr los objetivos
Amenazas y motores de cambio
Producción de energía y minería
Contaminación