English title
Developing an IUCN Policy and Guidance on Artificial Intelligence and Conservation, and the Integrity of Digital Evidence
Titre en français
Élaboration d’une politique et d’orientations de l’UICN relatives à l’intelligence artificielle et à la conservation, ainsi qu’à l’intégrité des preuves numériques
Título en español
Elaboración de una política y orientaciones de la UICN sobre inteligencia artificial y conservación, y la integridad de las pruebas digitales
Status
Plenary
Submission language
English
Working language
English
English files
- 143-PL-Developing an IUCN policy and guidance on artificial intelligence and conservation-EN.docx 2025-10-14 15:12
- 143-PL-Developing an IUCN policy and guidance on artificial intelligence and conservation-EN.pdf 2025-10-14 15:12
- 143-CG1-Developing an IUCN policy and guidance on artificial intelligence and conservation-EN.docx 2025-10-13 07:31
- 143-MA- Developing an IUCN policy and guidance on artificial intelligence and conservation-EN.docx 2025-10-12 09:33
- 143-MA- Developing an IUCN policy and guidance on artificial intelligence and conservation-EN.pdf 2025-10-12 09:33
Fichiers en français
- 143-PL-Politique et d orientations de l UICN relatives a l intelligence artificielle et conservation-FR.docx 2025-10-14 15:13
- 143-PL-Politique et d orientations de l UICN relatives a l intelligence artificielle et conservation-FR.pdf 2025-10-14 15:13
- 143-MA-Elaboration d une politique et d orientations de l UICN relatives a l intelligence artificielle -FR.pdf 2025-10-12 14:39
- 143-MA-Elaboration d une politique et d orientations de l UICN relatives a l intelligence artificielle -FR.docx 2025-10-12 14:38
Archivos en español
- 143-PL-Una politica y orientaciones de la UICN sobre inteligencia artificial y conservacion-ES.docx 2025-10-14 15:13
- 143-PL-Una politica y orientaciones de la UICN sobre inteligencia artificial y conservacion-ES.pdf 2025-10-14 15:13
- 143-MA-Elaboracion de una politica y orientaciones de la UICN sobre inteligencia artificial y conservacion-ES.docx 2025-10-12 12:25
- 143-MA-Elaboracion de una politica y orientaciones de la UICN sobre inteligencia artificial y conservacion-ES.pdf 2025-10-12 12:25
More information
Proponent (Sponsor)
Exploralis ( Tunisia )
Wildlife Trust of India ( India )
Co-sponsors
Natural Resources Defense Council ( USA )
International Association for the Conservation of Geological Heritage ( Sweden )
Fundación Global Nature ( Spain )
Edama for Nature Conservation ( State of Libya )
Club Marocain pour l'Environnement et le Développement ( Morocco )
Association Marocaine pour la Protection de l`Environnement et le Climat ( Morocco )
Association Tunisienne de Taxonomie ( Tunisia )
Association de Continuité de Générations ( Tunisia )
Association pour la Protection de l'Environnement et le Développement Durable de Bizerte ( Tunisia )
Green Compass ( Tunisia )
A ROCHA GHANA ( Ghana )
Aaranyak ( India )
Alpenzoo Innsbruck-Tirol ( Austria )
Botanical Survey of India ( India )
Conservation X Labs, Inc. ( USA )
IORA Ecological Trust ( India )
Indianapolis Zoological Society, Inc. ( USA )
International Rivers ( USA )
MBOU-MON-TOUR ( DR Congo )
Mandai Nature Fund Ltd ( Singapore )
New Mexico BioPark Society ( USA )
Reserva: The Youth Land Trust ( USA )
Synchronicity Earth ( UK )
The Corbett Foundation ( India )
The WILD Foundation ( USA )
Wetlands International ( Netherlands )
Wildlife Protection Society of India ( India )
Wildscreen ( UK )
Zoological Society of London ( UK )
Zoological Survey of India ( India )
Zoologischer Garten Köln ( Germany )
Explanatory memorandum
Conservation work rests on a fundamental principle: Evidence.
Camera-trap photos, acoustic recordings, satellite imagery, and citizen-science observations all shape knowledge, inform public policy, and uphold the credibility of conservation decisions.
Yet within just a few months, the rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has disrupted this foundation. Images, sounds, and maps can now be created or altered by algorithms, often beyond the capacity of human detection. For an organization built on scientific rigour, transparency, and public trust, this evolution poses a direct threat to the integrity of knowledge and the legitimacy of conservation action.
The challenge, however, is not only technical. AI models consume vast amounts of energy and materials, increasing the environmental footprint of the digital sector and at times contradicting the very principles of sustainability we promote. They also raise ethical and social concerns: unequal access to data and technology, marginalization of local knowledge systems, private appropriation of shared information, and potential violations of Indigenous Peoples’ and local communities’ rights.
Faced with these rapid transformations, there is an urgent need for a common framework for the responsible use of AI in conservation, one that safeguards data reliability, knowledge sovereignty, and ethical coherence across the Union’s activities.
This need coincides with a turning point in global governance: on 26 August 2025, the United Nations General Assembly adopted resolution A/79/L.118, establishing an Independent International Scientific Panel on AI and a Global Dialogue on AI Governance. This milestone opens an unprecedented opportunity for conservation voices to influence the emerging global norms for artificial intelligence. If IUCN does not engage now, these standards risk being defined without due consideration for ecological and ethical imperatives.
The motion therefore proposes the creation of an IUCN Strategic, Ethical and Ecological Framework for AI, to be developed through an interdisciplinary process involving the Commissions, Members, and field partners. This framework will aim to:
-Ensure the traceability and authenticity of visual and acoustic evidence;
-Strengthen the transparency and accountability of AI tools used by the Union;
-Promote media and information literacy (MIL) adapted to conservation professions;
- and assess and mitigate the environmental footprint of digital and AI-based solutions.
Implementation would draw on existing resources and programmes related to data governance, scientific communication, and capacity development. Early priorities include:
- A mapping of current AI uses across IUCN entities;
- The creation of a “Conservation & AI” learning module in cooperation with the CEC;
- and active engagement of IUCN in the Global Dialogue on AI Governance.
This motion is not a technocratic response, but an act of collective vigilance and responsibility toward a transformation that touches the very heart of conservation practice.
By acting now, IUCN reaffirms its role as an ethical and scientific compass , ensuring that artificial intelligence remains, at the service of life, not at the expense of its truth.
Camera-trap photos, acoustic recordings, satellite imagery, and citizen-science observations all shape knowledge, inform public policy, and uphold the credibility of conservation decisions.
Yet within just a few months, the rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has disrupted this foundation. Images, sounds, and maps can now be created or altered by algorithms, often beyond the capacity of human detection. For an organization built on scientific rigour, transparency, and public trust, this evolution poses a direct threat to the integrity of knowledge and the legitimacy of conservation action.
The challenge, however, is not only technical. AI models consume vast amounts of energy and materials, increasing the environmental footprint of the digital sector and at times contradicting the very principles of sustainability we promote. They also raise ethical and social concerns: unequal access to data and technology, marginalization of local knowledge systems, private appropriation of shared information, and potential violations of Indigenous Peoples’ and local communities’ rights.
Faced with these rapid transformations, there is an urgent need for a common framework for the responsible use of AI in conservation, one that safeguards data reliability, knowledge sovereignty, and ethical coherence across the Union’s activities.
This need coincides with a turning point in global governance: on 26 August 2025, the United Nations General Assembly adopted resolution A/79/L.118, establishing an Independent International Scientific Panel on AI and a Global Dialogue on AI Governance. This milestone opens an unprecedented opportunity for conservation voices to influence the emerging global norms for artificial intelligence. If IUCN does not engage now, these standards risk being defined without due consideration for ecological and ethical imperatives.
The motion therefore proposes the creation of an IUCN Strategic, Ethical and Ecological Framework for AI, to be developed through an interdisciplinary process involving the Commissions, Members, and field partners. This framework will aim to:
-Ensure the traceability and authenticity of visual and acoustic evidence;
-Strengthen the transparency and accountability of AI tools used by the Union;
-Promote media and information literacy (MIL) adapted to conservation professions;
- and assess and mitigate the environmental footprint of digital and AI-based solutions.
Implementation would draw on existing resources and programmes related to data governance, scientific communication, and capacity development. Early priorities include:
- A mapping of current AI uses across IUCN entities;
- The creation of a “Conservation & AI” learning module in cooperation with the CEC;
- and active engagement of IUCN in the Global Dialogue on AI Governance.
This motion is not a technocratic response, but an act of collective vigilance and responsibility toward a transformation that touches the very heart of conservation practice.
By acting now, IUCN reaffirms its role as an ethical and scientific compass , ensuring that artificial intelligence remains, at the service of life, not at the expense of its truth.
Geographic scope
Global
Nature and biodiversity
Birds
Mammals
Reptiles
Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF)
Target 14: Integrate biodiversity in decision-making at every level
Target 20: Strengthen capacity-building, technology transfer, and scientific and technical cooperation for biodiversity
Target 21: Ensure that knowledge is available and accessible to guide biodiversity action
Sustainable Development Goals
Goal 9 - industry, innovation and infrastructure
Goal 16 - peace, justice and strong institutions
Goal 17 - partnerships for the goals
Threats and drivers
Energy production & mining
Pollution