English title
Strengthening protective measures for protected areas against unsustainable tourism development
Titre en français
Renforcer les mesures de protection des aires protégées contre le développement touristique non durable
Título en español
Reforzar las medidas de protección de las áreas protegidas contra el desarrollo turístico no sostenible
Status
Online discussion
Submission language
English
Working language
English
English files
Fichiers en français
Archivos en español
More information
Proponent (Sponsor)
Ruajtja dhe Mbrojtja e Mejedisit Natyror ne Shqiperi ( Albania )
Co-sponsors
EuroNatur – Stiftung Europäisches Naturerbe ( Germany )
Tour du Valat ( France )
Wetlands International ( The Netherlands )
Sociedad Geológica de España ( Spain )
Mediterranean Institute for Nature and Anthropos ( Greece )
Institute for Nature Conservation in Albania ( Albania )
Centar za zastitu i proucavanje ptica Crne Gore ( Montenegro )
Centar za istrazuvanje i informiranje za zivotnaata sredina Eko-svest Skopje ( North Macedonia )
Udruga BIOM ( Croatia )
Bâlgarska Fondatzia Bioraznoobrazie ( Bulgaria )
Loro Parque Fundación ( Spain )
Association Les Amis des Oiseaux ( Tunisia )
Fondation Prince Albert II de Monaco ( Monaco )
BirdLife International ( United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland )
Explanatory memorandum
Explanatory Memorandum - for the motion titled “Strengthening protective measures for protected areas against unsustainable tourism development”
Protected areas are established to conserve biodiversity, ecosystem services and cultural heritage. The IUCN standards for categories I and II emphasize strict protection, with limited human activities allowed only if they are consistent with conservation objectives. However, the rapid growth of tourism – also in protected areas - has increasingly undermined these objectives.
While tourism is often seen as a means of promoting conservation awareness and generating local revenue, including in protected areas, it has also led to habitat destruction, pollution, ecosystem fragmentation and exacerbated climate impacts. Poorly planned and regulated tourism development within protected areas intensifies these problems and threaten the very values that these areas are meant to protect.
The case of Albania is a showpiece of the global problem. Amended Law No. 21 on Protected Areas (2024) allows large-scale tourism infrastructure, such as luxury hotels, in core zones of protected areas, including those designated as IUCN Category I and II. This law contradicts IUCN principles, undermines international conservation efforts and sets a dangerous precedent for other countries.
The main concerns regarding tourism development in protected areas are related to development practices that contradict the management objectives of the protected areas, weak management and enforcement mechanisms to regulate tourism in these areas, and excessive climate impacts on the natural environment.
Tourism infrastructure, such as roads, hotels and recreational facilities, often leads to habitat destruction, biodiversity loss and pollution. These impacts are particularly severe in the core zones of protected areas. Many countries lack a solid legal and regulatory framework for the sustainable management of tourism in protected areas. The example of Albania shows how legal changes can subvert protective measures. The development of tourism in protected areas reduces natural carbon sinks, increases greenhouse gas emissions and weakens the resilience of ecosystems, undermining global efforts to adapt to climate change.
The motion calls for a ban on tourism infrastructure in IUCN Category I and II core zones, covering at least 75% of the area, to prioritize conservation over tourism, calls on governments to align their national laws and policies with IUCN guidelines, particularly with regard to banning environmentally damaging developments, asks IUCN to provide technical and strategic support to its member organizations, including Albania, to restore and strengthen conservation measures, and calls for the application of standardized assessments before approving tourism developments in protected areas.
The motion is a call to the global conservation community to reaffirm the role of protected areas as havens for biodiversity and to ensure that tourism development does not jeopardize their most important objectives. By adopting these measures, IUCN and its members can conserve protected areas for future generations while meeting the challenges of modern tourism and climate change.
Protected areas are established to conserve biodiversity, ecosystem services and cultural heritage. The IUCN standards for categories I and II emphasize strict protection, with limited human activities allowed only if they are consistent with conservation objectives. However, the rapid growth of tourism – also in protected areas - has increasingly undermined these objectives.
While tourism is often seen as a means of promoting conservation awareness and generating local revenue, including in protected areas, it has also led to habitat destruction, pollution, ecosystem fragmentation and exacerbated climate impacts. Poorly planned and regulated tourism development within protected areas intensifies these problems and threaten the very values that these areas are meant to protect.
The case of Albania is a showpiece of the global problem. Amended Law No. 21 on Protected Areas (2024) allows large-scale tourism infrastructure, such as luxury hotels, in core zones of protected areas, including those designated as IUCN Category I and II. This law contradicts IUCN principles, undermines international conservation efforts and sets a dangerous precedent for other countries.
The main concerns regarding tourism development in protected areas are related to development practices that contradict the management objectives of the protected areas, weak management and enforcement mechanisms to regulate tourism in these areas, and excessive climate impacts on the natural environment.
Tourism infrastructure, such as roads, hotels and recreational facilities, often leads to habitat destruction, biodiversity loss and pollution. These impacts are particularly severe in the core zones of protected areas. Many countries lack a solid legal and regulatory framework for the sustainable management of tourism in protected areas. The example of Albania shows how legal changes can subvert protective measures. The development of tourism in protected areas reduces natural carbon sinks, increases greenhouse gas emissions and weakens the resilience of ecosystems, undermining global efforts to adapt to climate change.
The motion calls for a ban on tourism infrastructure in IUCN Category I and II core zones, covering at least 75% of the area, to prioritize conservation over tourism, calls on governments to align their national laws and policies with IUCN guidelines, particularly with regard to banning environmentally damaging developments, asks IUCN to provide technical and strategic support to its member organizations, including Albania, to restore and strengthen conservation measures, and calls for the application of standardized assessments before approving tourism developments in protected areas.
The motion is a call to the global conservation community to reaffirm the role of protected areas as havens for biodiversity and to ensure that tourism development does not jeopardize their most important objectives. By adopting these measures, IUCN and its members can conserve protected areas for future generations while meeting the challenges of modern tourism and climate change.
Geographic scope
Global
Nature and biodiversity
Forests
Marine & Coastal
Wetlands
Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF)
Target 1: Plan and manage all areas to reduce biodiversity loss
Target 3: Conserve 30% of land, waters and seas
Target 8: Minimize the impacts of climate change on biodiversity and build resilience
Sustainable Development Goals
Goal 3 - good health and well-being
Goal 13 - climate action
Goal 15 - life on land
Threats and drivers
Climate change & severe weather
Human intrusions & disturbance
Natural system modifications